Reply to China Suspends Export of Critical Rare Earth Minerals

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "China Suspends Export of Critical Rare Earth Minerals"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Unlike China, which has a state-coordinated mining strategy, U.S. miners must navigate decades-old policies that offer no streamlined pathway for rare earth projects.  Moreover, permitting a new mine in the U.S. can take several years— compared to 2–3 years in China—due to excessive federal, state, and local regulatory hurdles.

While environmental protection is necessary, U.S. regulations on rare earth mining contradict themselves and discourage investment rather than ensure responsible development.  A multiplicity of statues is involved. Take the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires years-long reviews that often result in lawsuits and delay projects indefinitely.  Then there is the Clean Water Act & Endangered Species Act (opens in a new tab), with federal agencies often conflicting with each other over mining approvals, forcing companies to comply with overlapping or contradictory rules from EPA, Fish & Wildlife, and the Army Corps of Engineers.

Then, there are bureaucratic redundancies that slow actions down. Mining projects could require approvals from multiple agencies (BLM, USGS, DOE, DOI, DOD, EPA, and state governments)—each with different timelines and priorities.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics