Reply to JD and Usha

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "JD and Usha"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No decent woman would have married vance or trump. 
 Usha definitely profited from DEI so why is she still around?[/quote]

Actually, Vance definitely benefitted from DEI.  [/quote]

DEI (TM) wasn’t invented until 2020, years after Vance got into Yale.

Not all programs that expand access to underrepresented groups are DEI (TM) and DEI (TM) did not reach all underrepresented groups. In particular, DEI (TM) favored a worldview where privilege was measured by skin color, gender, and status as a sexual minority and almost completely ignored the actual current driver of inequality in our society which is money, class, and what kind of family you were born into.

(I put the TMs to mean Trademark, because so many people on this board do not understand the difference between the program invented in 2020 vs. actual diversity, equity, and inclusion. Sorry if it’s lame.)[/quote]

Oh my God, Vance was obviously a diversity higher whatever you call the program that drove it.

He was a subpar candidate who got in as a way to build a class that was more diverse. Just because you have some weird hang up about gender doesn’t change that fact. [/quote]

I’m confused. Are you for or against admitting “subpar” candidates in order to build a more diverse class?

Your post seems obtuse. It very much matters what program drove the decision. DEI (TM) is highly race focused, followed by other identity categories, but did not address class in any direct way.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics