Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Feds Only Reasonable Accomodations"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]One thing to keep in mind is that, even if a worker is entitled to an accommodation, it doesn’t have to be the accommodation preferred by the employee if another accommodation would allow the person to work. So let’s the length of the commute is the problem. If the employer offered to waive core hour requirements so that the employee could commute off hours when the commute might be substantially shorter, that might suffice. If the employee complained that such unusually work hours wouldn’t be possible because of obligations to get kids to school, for example, that may not be the employers problem. I would expect agencies to take a pretty hardline, even at the risk of possibly losing a case or two where the employee really has an issue that can’t be accommodated another the way. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
