Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "In general, ED at LACs does not provide any advantage"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Whether ED offer an advantage at LACs is a tricky subject because it's hard to disaggregate the ED data when things like recruited athletes, Questbridge, FGLI, academically stronger ED pools, etc. are factored in. But, I think that as a general rule of thumb, the advantage of ED at LACs is a sliding scale from the least advantageous at the very most selective schools and the most advantageous in the 10-30 ranking zone. It's obvious advice, but it bears noting. No advantage: WASP Small advantage: Bowdoin (when we visited the AO said ED doesn't offer any advantage, but Bowdoin still considers demonstrated interest, so ED must have some small advantage) Wellesley - Big advantage Carleton - Big advantage CMC Big advantage: Midd - No advantage Wesleyan - - No advantage Grinnell -- No advantage Most LACs ranked 10-30[/quote] I think this is a good list. But I would create a special, “disadvantage” category for Amherst and Williams. [/quote] Frankly no advantage for Grinnell, Midd as 50% of ed are athletes. Carleton, Wellesley, yes as their athlete % is a bit lower than others https://xfactoradmissions.com/basic-guide-to-college-admissions/total-ncaa-athletes-at-the-top-colleges [/quote] Have to be suspicious of any website whose narrative for Williams gives one number, while the table immediately below it gives another. The proper (government) site to lookup athlete percentages is this: https://ope.ed.gov/athletics/#/institution/search Athletes are one variable. For instance, Swarthmore goes crazy recruiting first gen. Then: does the school have 2 rounds of ED; what is the ED admissions rate: and what is the percent of class filled ED. So, “frankly,” Grinnell and Midd are huge advantages. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics