Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "One of DOGE's "cost saving" suggestions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If they want to eliminate members of the Federal workforce, they need to make changes in the laws about that Feds are expected to do. I'm not suggesting we stop inspecting food or controlling air traffic, but if you cut the workforce, there has to be some cut in the workload that corresponds. There's not a ton a Feds doing no work (I am sure there are a few). So if there is some reasoned proposal on what work DOGE no longer wants done, they should put it forth, and ask Congress to act on eliminating those functions. Randomly cutting or firing people without this makes no sense.[/quote] Yup - lots of waste and sleepers in gvt but also lots of hardworking people putting in the work and extra hours. It would be lovely to think the cuts would be the waste and not the grinders, but I’m little hope of that[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
