Reply to Crawley admits Romney was right on Libya

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Crawley admits Romney was right on Libya"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Congrats on getting your candidate to show up and open his mouth.  The general phrase "acts of terror" does not refer to Benghazi as an "act of terror." [/quote]

Seriously?  The president gives a speech the next day mourning the loss of brave Americans and saying that acts of terror will not shake our resolve and you are complaining that he didn't say "[u]this [/u]act of terror"?  That's pathetic.[/quote]

It's called semantics. 
You must be unfamiliar with Bill Clinton's line "It depends on what your definition of 'is' is."

O knew he didn't call it what it was. AND he's a lawyer; knew what he was doing. You, it seems, are simply naive.

Romney was right: Obama and his administration DID NOT call it what it was until nearly 2 weeks later. Period.[/quote]

And why are you so hung up about what it was called when? 
[/quote]

Because the president [i]out and out lied about a terrorist attack[/i] but the country is full of sheep who view him as some Illuminated King and might vote him back into office for 4 more years of lies and incompetence??[/quote]

Please tell me if you voted for Bush on his second term.  Please tell me, if you voted  for the administration that lied to their people and the whole world about WMD for years, and dragged us into war with fabricated intelligence on purpose. 
I just need to know, before we talk about why the current president was saying or not saying something for a few days after a foreign embassy attack.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics