Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Romney and women in the workforce"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Disagree. I thought Romney's response was great. You think it is a negative that only men applied and he sought apps from women and ended up with more women on his cabinet than any other state? Also, what is negative about flexable work schedules? Maybe I'm biased by the horrendous traffic here in DC, but I think there are multiple reasons (in addition to kids) to be open to flexible schedules.[/quote] You're biased by the traffic here in DC? Where do you think the rest of are posting from? Iowa? There is nothing negative about flexible (note the 'i' for future use) work schedules, but there is something wrong with pointing out that women need some sort of accommodation since they are women. You know, odd creatures who have to be home to feed dinner to their offspring. :roll:[/quote] Ordinarily I would not respond to this type of thing but you made a big deal of my misspelling of "flexable" in the first sentence of my post when I obviously spelled it correctly in the very next sentence of my post (yet you did not similarly note that in the "future" I did use the "i"!!!) Obviously an Ipad typing issue. I guess I should be thankful that you did not "sic" me . . . . I see where your priorities lie.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics