Reply to Is binding ED the next shoe to drop?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Is binding ED the next shoe to drop?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The most selective colleges will never willingly give up ED. It’s far too advantageous for them.  It’s not even for the full pay students. High endowment schools will make it work for nearly every family. It’s because they can craft much of their class with students that both really want to be there and meet their institutional needs - athletes, engineers, vip, Pell grant, English majors, international etc. Every student has a box and ED allows the schools to fill these boxes as they see fit. [/quote]

The most selective colleges don’t have ED.[/quote]

Of course they do.  What a silly comment.

https://www.ivycoach.com/the-ivy-coach-blog/early-decision-early-action/schools-with-early-decision/[/quote]

Depends on what you mean by "most selective".  But the top 5 schools (Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, and MIT)  do not have early decision.[/quote]

Semantics. They have Single Choice Early Action, which is effectively the same thing. But agree that applying early to HYSMP doesn't make a difference for unhooked students. But ED does confer advantages at Duke, Penn, Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Brown, Columbia, Rice, Northwestern, Chicago, and Cornell. Only a deeply out of touch person would regard them as less than "most selective." Ironically, it's often the ED rejects that end up at HYPSM in the RD round. [/quote]

It’s not semantics, single choice early action is not binding on the student.[/quote]

It does prevent you from applying to other ED schools, so there's a huge opportunity cost. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics