Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Unemployment at 7.8%"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]you can pretty much throw out any idea these days and find someone to find your argument "plausible" regardless of if there is any evidence to support your theory. we allow these nutso ideas more life than they deserve. considering that there was no problem with the data at 8% and above, how are we now going to "question" them when they hit a mark unfavorable to some narrative you want to hold on to against your opponent? if the numbers are fudged,they are fudged all the time. enron didnt cook the books one month and present "real" data the next. the books were cooked from jump. plus, how stupid is obama and the white house to not want to "manipulate" the numbers more favorably? what makes them think 7.8% is a "good" unemployment number? if i was president, i would have had the number falling steadily for months leading up to my re-election. this means obama either "allowed" unemployment to go up as high as 9% for god knows what reason, and then decide to start applying his "grand scheme" to knock the number down to do "oh so great" 7.8%. do people realize how stupid that is?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics