Reply to Explain to me this portion of the pro-choice/pro-life argument

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Explain to me this portion of the pro-choice/pro-life argument"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Agree with many of the PP's, and you're right there is middle ground here.  I personally would like to see much less "war on women" bombs continually coming from the ladies of the DNC, because there truly isn't one. [/quote]As a rhetorical point you may be right.  It is not a real war.

And I realize that the party would like to attract women.

But face facts:  the party actively seeks legislation reducing rights of women. It opposes legislation meant to redress histnissan bias against women in the workplace.  Only 10% of house republicans are women.

So when the party is behind by 20% among women in a key state like Florida, it is not because of the attractiveness of the Democratic party. It is because they have been alienated by the GOP. [/quote]

There's presently six female governors...two are Democrats. Oh and for what it's worth, those two are "just" white. Why can't you be more inclusive to minorities like we Republicans?  Just curious. [/quote]

Ooh, 4 vs. 2.  That's really significant.  There are 241 Republicans in the House.  10% is pitiful.
[/quote]

That's totally significant, really it is. Republicans still hold the House, so until we start using token demographics to rule the first branch of government, then it's actually just the opposite....pretty insignificant.   You guys are so obsessed with tokenism, you'll clear the field for a moron like Carol Shea Porter just to increase these meaningless statistics. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics