Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Has the faculty search gotten worse?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't know anything about Amherst, but at a lot of schools there has been a tilt toward teaching (non tenure track) faculty members. The tenure track faculty have the same pedigrees and publication expectations as before (often higher tenure standards, in fact) but they are a smaller portion of the faculty as a whole.[/quote] These are tenure track faculty being discussed with really low publication records[/quote] Having publications doesn't make one a better instructor. Do you want good teachers or just impressive research? It's hard to do both. [/quote] The top LACs have always had both. So have the top universities. You shouldn't be a bad researcher as a Professor, unless you're at a community college. Amherst is a research-teaching expected load. You will get a 2/2 and be expected to release books, have a publication record, and work with students. [/quote] If you want published books for a new faculty member, you're looking for someone who's adjuncted or postdoced for years after their PhD, not a new grad...because even for humanities and social studies scholars with minimal revisions to their dissertations, it takes a couple years to get to print! OTOH some colleges prefer to hire shiny new grads or "prestige postdocs" (e.g. Princeton, Michigan societies) who have a ton of potential and haven't disgraced themselves with non-TT jobs yet. Often a book contract is enough. Also, journal timelines in these fields can be awful compared to physical sciences - I submitted an article based on my MA research that didn't come out until three years later. Horrible for the CV. I don't think it's fair to say someone who got their PhD two years ago is a "bad researcher" because they have a couple articles but their book isn't out yet, and I also think it's mean spirited to pick on individuals in an anonymous forum. And I'm not even in academia anymore, so I have no stake, I just don't like the direction of this thread. [/quote] Hard Agree. I've never seen a humanities faculty member who just emerged from a PhD program already with a released book.[/quote] Lot of the new faculty here look like they came from postdocs not straight from the PhD program. The idea behind the postdoc is you’re supposed to turn your thesis into a book. Possibly they have completed the book but haven’t found a publisher yet.[/quote] Postdocs have become weird push over positions for you to teach grad students and undergrads, while taking up another labs research and somehow conducting your own at the same time in the sciences. Some schools, Pomona being one of the only LACs from memory, use PostDoc positions to track new faculty in the humanities with more independent support.[/quote] In my experience out of an Ivy League PhD program, the people who got the best tenure track jobs didn't spend more than a year in a postdoc (and many of them were "I'll fix you up until you find a job" postdocs or lecturer gigs, not competitive ones). They didn't have time to get a book out. They were hired on their success at getting grants for their dissertations, one or two articles, pedigree, and potential. Frankly, PhDs are considered "stale" shockingly fast and there's a very short window to get a TT job at a top school. Also forgot to mention the racism earlier in the thread is gross - yeah, that's what it is when you state in a public forum that people are less qualified because you don't know how publication in their field works and you see they're not white. [/quote] Yeah, that's an ivy league PHD thing. Everyone else is sorta expected to be jerked around into multiple postdocs before ever touching a tenure track position. Seems like Amherst is pushing a bit against this which is a great thing[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics