Reply to 198 Democrats Voted Against the SAVE Act

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "198 Democrats Voted Against the SAVE Act"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s not redundant. Here’s SAN news

“Under the current National Voter Registration Act, individuals attest to their citizenship by checking a box on registration forms. However, the SAVE Act proposes significant changes, requiring prospective voters to furnish documentation proving their citizenship. Accepted forms of proof include a U.S. passport, a photo ID card issued with proof of citizenship, or a combination of a photo ID and supporting documents like a birth certificate.

For those lacking these documents, states would gain access to federal agency databases to verify citizenship status for voter registration purposes, according to the text of the bill. The bill also includes provisions to remove noncitizens from voter rolls and grants discretion to the Department of Homeland Security to deport noncitizens found to have illegally registered to vote.“
[/quote]

Sounds good to me.  Most countries require voter ID - why shouldn't we?  Who on earth would vote against this?[/quote]

There already are plenty of checks to ensure that non-citizens don't get to vote.

The nonsense fearmongering that Republicans keep spreading about illegals voting has repeatedly been debunked.  https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/may/20/mike-johnson/mike-johnsons-false-claim-that-immigrants-paroled/[/quote]

Why won't you answer a simple question:  why are you opposed to U.S. citizens being required to show ID at the voting booth, just as countries around the world require of their citizens?  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics