Reply to Euro 2024

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Euro 2024"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NED V FRA.  offsides or not? I say this was a terrible call. Line of vision and play not effected. [/quote]

If you watch the view from behind the goal, I do feel like the goaliee was moving to the ball and then checked himself when he realized the player was there. Maybe he wasn't in the line of sight, but I did feel he impacted the play.[/quote]

DS is a ref and it was an offsides for him, not even close. [/quote]

You cannot NOT call offside there. Attacker needed to get the hell out of the way. Dumb-ss But, based on the laws, it's tough. The criteria for offside is 
1. Interfering with play by playing or touching the ball. Nope
2. Interfering with an opponent by
- CLEARLY obstructing the opponents line of vision. Nope 
- Challenging an opponent for the ball. Nope
- Clearly attempting to play the ball that is close when this action impacts on an opponent. Nope
- Making an obvious action that clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball. - This is where the offside call came from. Personally, I believe it was the BEST call. Although from the back angle, I felt like the GK was dead. No way of getting to that ball and didn't even react until the ball was going past him. Nevertheless, if I was AR, I would have called offside. If I was VAR, I would have called offside.

As referee myself, I thought there was an interesting call in the Belgium match today. The Belgian right winger, I forget his name, was dribbling, cut in and was dribbling across the top of the box and stepped on the  defenders foot and the ref called a foul against the dribbler/attacker. I've never seen that called before.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics