Reply to TSJFC

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "TSJFC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]First of all FCV wasn't Toxic and calling all former parents toxic is toxic behavior.  The St. James made this situation bad for the coaches and players by promising permanent fields and then not delivering on it   New parents are in for a wake up call as soon as you start participating in any national level events.  The GA is a competitive league and from what I've seen of the players staying or moving to TSJ, they won't be competitive.  This is true even with the best teams moving to ECNL.  To BC credit, it appears that he got rid of some of the coaches they announced as GA coaches early on.  This will be a net positive for the new TSJ.  I wonder if the players these old announced coaches selected for the teams will still be the players.  BC was absent from that process.  You can claim you are a development club, but when you lose games the best players leave for greener pastures.  If BC does manage to turn around the club, you may see some of the old players come back.  Do you know what that means for the existing players?  It's a business and at the end of the day the club has to be competitive to win.  This is true for any club.  The best players will seek out the place where they will be trained properly and recruited, wearever that happens to be.  It changes from year to year based on results.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics