Reply to Did you know Obama's father was a drunk, deadbeat loser?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Did you know Obama's father was a drunk, deadbeat loser?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A general question: Are children responsible for the actions of their parents? If my father was a criminal, was that my fault? If my father was a hero, do I get credit for that? If the answer to both questions is "no", then your post is completely meaningless.
[/quote]

As meaningless as the post about Romney's family.[/quote]
No.  The post about Romney's family and welfare is relevant because welfare is an example of a program many conservatives hate.  Romney's family is an example of a welfare success story.  
That's absolutely the way that welfare should work.  I applaud them for pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, and I applaud America for providing the bootstraps.

Obama's dad being a drunk is totally irrelevant, because having an abusive parent has no bearing on POLICY.

If it's true that Obama's dad was an abusive drunk, then I applaud Obama all the more for overcoming his difficult childhood.  Thanks for sharing his inspiring story, OP![/quote]

Conservatives don't hate welfare.  Nor do they wipe their asses with $100 bills.  You are brainwashed from too much mainstream media.[/quote]

Oh, really?  Do you think progressives coined phrases like "entitlement mentality" and "welfare queens?"  I've never met a true conservative who espouses genuine concern for the poor.  Where do they congregate?  I'd truly enjoy meeting some.[/quote]

Hard core conservative Bill O'Reilly gives millions to charity every year - all proceeds from his book and his website go to charity.  And even he is not "against welfare."

Your post just makes no sense.  I've never heard the term "welfare queen," but I can sure guess at what it means (somebody who for a while has lived on public assistance because they are too lazy to work, not because they cannot work).  So what does that or these sort of people have to do with anything?  Does anybody support that sort of behavior?  I don't think so.  These terms are so irrelevant.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics