Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "More waitlist movement than usual?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]What do you all think this will mean for next year? Will schools accept more kids at the start? [/quote] No, they can't risk over enrolling their class. Hopefully, people will see the results from this class and dial back the frenzy and the 20+ applications. [/quote] Disagree. The EM models didn’t work this year. Either AOs start focusing on DI differently to find the kids who will actually accept, or the same thing happens next year (remember population boom ends with this next class so we aren’t at peak college applicants yet)[/quote] What’s EM and DI mean?[/quote] EM= Enrollment Management[/quote] And DI = Demonstrated Interest Basically, DI is now gameified. Kids know they have to go on the tours, attend the virtual sessions, open the emails and click on the links. It’s just part of the job of applying to college. So the fact that kids do those things is no longer a good indicator of actual interest. [/quote] Agreed. The admissions offices will have to look at the carnage of this year and figure out based on the new data who is actually interested in enrolling. My child got into our selective state flagship. He was waitlisted by an Ivy where he was a legacy but chose not to pursue the waitlist just to "see" what would happen. I kind of wish we had the data point but it's enough to know they didn't want to directly admit him. One thing I found interesting was that Pitt asked for info on all the schools he applied to when he declined the offer. Clearly they are going to datamine that for next year. I am a Pitt alum and I appreciated that they were smart enough to do that. The only way Pitt would have been in the running for my son would have been if he got rejected from our flagship or if he got a fantastic scholarship which he did not. But I think so highly of the school and what it did for my family (& donate $) that I like to know they are prepping for the future. Younger son may consider if he can raise his SATs to 1500. The thing that will be different next year is the impact of the giant FAFSA screw-up this year. I think that will be hard to account for and that models built on this year's data will have to be redone after next year's season ends. I don't think the enrollment cliff will impact the Top 50 schools or the number of apps per student. With admit rates below 10% for Ivies, it doesn't really matter if the number of applicants falls by a huge amount. Admissions will still be lottery ticket like.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics