Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Boundary study materials float "open-enrollment gifted and talented programming""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I came up through ES and MS GT programs in NYC, which were a v. mixed bag. There wasn't nearly enough challenge for the stronger students in regular classes and most of the kids selected as "gifted" were, unsurprisingly, white, UMC and heavily prepped for GT screening exams. Flash forward 40 years and NYC has dropped ES test-in GT. What I'd like to see DCPS move toward is the intelligent, balanced system Arlington is phasing in to add middle school rigor, never mind nonsense about open-enrollment GT programming for advanced classes that don't exist. In Arlington, the ES curriculum is tougher than in DCPS and 7th and 8th graders can freely sign up for upper level "intensified" classes in core subjects. However, if a particular intensified class isn't recommended by a core subject teacher for a 6th grade student entering 7th grade, or for a 7th grade student entering 8th, families are encouraged to think twice about enrolling for the upcoming year. They're told that content won't be dumbed down to cater to academic stragglers. Arlington practices flex tracking: kids can drop down to regular classes, or jump up to intensified classes, during the school year. They aren't locked in to a level that isn't working for them.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics