Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "NYT Article on Open Marriage "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Articles like this are just voyeurism on couples heading toward their inevitable end. Polyamorous and open marriages never work. Ever. The human condition doesn't allow for it. Someone gets feelings. Someone gets resentment. It doesn't work. [/quote] The point of polyamory is to have feelings for more than one person. It’s not swinging, which is just about sex. I’ve been in a poly quad for over 7 years. I don’t expect it to last forever, but that’s okay. It’s already lasted longer than some marriages I know. [/quote] So, swinging is not polyamory? [/quote] Swinging is a lot easier than polyamory. One love relationship is hard enough to manage. More than one would be impossible. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
