Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Boundary Review December town halls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I'm an OOB parent at a elementary school that is currently 45 percent at-risk. We are a middle income family and our child is not an English learner and not in special education. Would I be able to keep sending my child to our school under this proposal? Our current plan is to keep them there through grade 5. Would another parent like me who didn't previously have a kid at the school be able to enroll since we are above the 30 percent threshold? I think the answer to both of these questions is yes, but asking those who went to the meeting or are on the committee. Would I - and would this theoretical new parent - retain feeder rights to our middle school, which is currently 29 percent at-risk? (I'm less certain of this one.) Assuming we can stay at our elementary and retain feeder rights to our middle, I think this is a good plan, both equity-wise and selfishly. (And yes, before you point it out, DCUM, I'm for what's good for equity as long as I get to stay in my preferred schools, which is yes, hypocritical and I realize that). I also think my school (disadvantaged population but good feeder and reputation) could benefit enrollment-wise under this plan. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics