Reply to The Kowalski v. Johns Hopkins verdict is a legal travest

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "The Kowalski v. Johns Hopkins verdict is a legal travest"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If anyone has been following the "Take Care of Maya" trial, the jury awarded the Kowalskis a whooping 7 million against Johns Hopkins. This is such a legal travesty.

When I was in middle school in the early 2000s, my classmate lost her little brother. The entire class made cards that said sorry for your loss, etc. I overheard conversations between teachers and paraprofessionals. They said to each other "if I were the parents, I would sue the hospital" or something along those lines several times.

I do understand it's hard to lose a child, but that doesn't automatically mean the hospital is at fault. [b]If you think the hospital indeed did something wrong, you should be filing a complaint with the state medical board, not suing. They will do an investigation and decide if the hospital is at fault and take appropriate action, including revoking licenses if necessary. There is absolutely no need to sue a hospital ever. [/b]It raises healthcare costs for others and of course malpractice insurance, so no one will want to become a doctor because they are afraid some crazy person will sue them.

This is one of the reasons we have a teacher shortage. A teacher does something a parent doesn't like, a parent raises hell left and right with the administration or even sue the district for millions. Just look at the Savanna Redding case. The parent sued after the school strip-searched on suspicion she has drugs. If they had not strip-searched her and someone died of the drugs another parent would sue the school. Damned of you do, damned if you don't.

And here a family got $7 million just because they don't like a licensed child abuse pediatrics specialist doctor claimed Beata had Munchausen's. Now parents with Munchausen's can get $7 million by claiming licensed Hippocratic sworn doctors are fraudsters.

My sister did this. She decided the school the district wanted to put my autistic niece in is a bad school, so she got an attorney to bully the district into placing my niece in a different school. She calls this "advocating" for her child.  My parents are Polish just like the Kowalskis and [b][i]adwokat[/i][/b] means [b][i]lawyer[/i][/b] in Polish and other languages. The last thing you should be doing is suing others.[/quote]
I don't think those are mutually exclusive. I am a hospital nurse and I agree that people are sue happy in the US.  People use it as a threat all the time when they don't get what they want in the hospital. And it can be stressful for all involved on the receiving end. But--having worked in health care--I think you are naive about how hospitals handle bad or negligent health care providers.  [b]Ask most hospital nurses-they all know at least one surgeon they would never let touch a family member because they have messed up so many times.[/b] But the hospitals look the other way despite concerns being raised bc it costs them money.  A lot of hospitals settle out of court.  It is actually not as easy as people make it seem to sue--there needs to be evidence of harm and dereliction of duty. [/quote]

OP here. If a surgeon is indeed messing up so many times that they shouldn't be practicing, then the hospital is [b][u]required[/u][/b] to fire the surgeon. Moreover, the state will investigate and take away their license if necessary. Hospitals are over-regulated as it is. If you couldn't do your job right, the state would take away your license too. [b]That's how it works.[/b][/quote]

Except it doesn’t consistently work that way and meanwhile people are suffering needlessly.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics