Reply to Counsel for School Board Submits Brief to SCOTUS Requesting Denial of Certiorari

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Counsel for School Board Submits Brief to SCOTUS Requesting Denial of Certiorari"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Weak sauce from the Coalition in reply to the Board's brief....

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-170/288629/20231101155505744_FINAL%20TJ%20REPLY%20BRIEF.pdf

The tone presented here suggests that the Coalition knows that there is a strong possibility that it's gonna be denied.[/quote]

It's a reply brief.  They aren't expected to repeat all the arguments they made in their original petition.  [/quote]

I mean, sure, but the reply itself can be boiled down to “It’s a 2-2 tie, Hilton and Rushing vs. Heytens and King, so you have to break it”.

They didn’t refute any of the key points in the initial post made here. Which is what a reply is theoretically supposed to do. Verrilli’s strongest points went completely unaddressed, and the argument about the Coalition’s “second look” proposal sounded like “well, we HAD to do that”.[/quote]

The only thing we know for sure is that the perspective of the Supreme Court does not necessarily align with that of FCPS or its pro bono hired gun.  [/quote]

It aligns with their largest sponsors if the recent news about Thomas is any indication.[/quote]

Consider that the GOP has somehow appointed 6 of the nine justices despite only winning the popular vote for President once in the past 30 years. These guys aren't legit and are out of step with the mainstream of our country.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics