Reply to Counsel for School Board Submits Brief to SCOTUS Requesting Denial of Certiorari

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Counsel for School Board Submits Brief to SCOTUS Requesting Denial of Certiorari"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Weak sauce from the Coalition in reply to the Board's brief....

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-170/288629/20231101155505744_FINAL%20TJ%20REPLY%20BRIEF.pdf

The tone presented here suggests that the Coalition knows that there is a strong possibility that it's gonna be denied.[/quote]

It's a reply brief.  They aren't expected to repeat all the arguments they made in their original petition.  [/quote]

I mean, sure, but the reply itself can be boiled down to “It’s a 2-2 tie, Hilton and Rushing vs. Heytens and King, so you have to break it”.

They didn’t refute any of the key points in the initial post made here. Which is what a reply is theoretically supposed to do. Verrilli’s strongest points went completely unaddressed, and the argument about the Coalition’s “second look” proposal sounded like “well, we HAD to do that”.[/quote]

The only thing we know for sure is that the perspective of the Supreme Court does not necessarily align with that of FCPS or its pro bono hired gun.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics