Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "“Equity math” coming to FCPS?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NP here. I support tracking students by ability. But there is a lot of evidence that teaching integrated math - not separating algebra, geometry, etc - is better for students and leads to more thorough comprehension. This region is too focused on accelerating kids through a checklist instead of slowing down and letting them engage with theory and real world application.[/quote] A lot of support? https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/ramona-sentinel/opinion/sd-cm-ram-commentary-fay-20170120-story.html https://www.rcschools.net/apps/news/article/1764568 https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/georgia-to-abandon-mandate-on-teaching-integrated-math/2015/02 Take equity out of the equation. What is the valid scientific support for it? [/quote] Did you read the articles you linked? You have an editorial from somebody whose main criticism is their kids didn't get good grades, and one from somebody saying teachers didn't want to change how they taught. Neither suggests it isn't better for students. (Most literature on integrated math acknowledges teachers will need support to adjust their lesson plans.) Integrated math is taught almost everywhere in the world except the US. It's weird to fret about US math education falling behind globally, but refuse to consider we could be teaching it better. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics