Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "View of privates from a former college admissions staffer"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Of course Big 3/5 schools will have better college acceptance rates than publics. Publics have lots of kids who don't even go to college, and/or cannot afford to go to college. It's an apples to orange comparison.[/quote] So many top colleges now are tuition-free or require zero financial contribution for middle class families or those who make even less. Almost no one at the top privates falls in that category.[/quote] The top colleges are still heavily skewed to the wealthy and ultra-wealthy. The top 1% of the population by income comprise around 15% of the student body at Ivy schools. Sure, if you are lucky enough to get accepted as middle class, then it is free...however, the schools still prefer to admit kids with high GPAs, strong test scores, impressive ECs, athletes (which outside of revenue sports skew wealthy to ultra-wealthy), etc. All the things that wealthy kids present much better than middle-class kids (BTW, wealthy public kids at a Whitman or Langley also have this advantage).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics