Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "5th graders taking 6th grade map m"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] The chart shows RIT score percentiles vs. students who took the test in a particular grade, not students who took a particular grade's test. How is it fair if a student in Math 5/6 took the MAP-M 6+ and scored 230 due to the noted adaptive-testing variability at that switchover, but would have scored a 245 on the MAP-M that is given to students in their same grade, but in Math 5 (which we've seen -- just looking at spring scores from the prior year, which track closely to the following year's fall scores).[/quote] That child is still above the 85th percentile however. There's no actual harm done because everything above that percentile is a lottery. [/quote] You're forgetting the local norming that occurs. The curoff from a low-FARMS school would fall between those numbers. Or consider it this way: what if a student who would have gotten a 230 (92nd %ile for fall of 5th grade) from a FARMS-tranche school for which that %ile would qualify got a 220 (77th %ile) for which [i]that[/i] %ile wouldn't qualify because of the variability that seems inherent in the move to the 6+ test? You seem to be ignoring the specifics in an effort to justify an approach that fails when it comes to those specifics.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics