Reply to For those who are anti wfh, curious why you care?

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "For those who are anti wfh, curious why you care? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't care at all, but I think one should take a paycut. Generally, I think anyone who has a job that requires one to work in person, should be paid considerably more. From the grocery restocker to yard work people to teachers to construction crew to janitors to nurses. [/quote]

As a federal government employee who strongly prefers to work from home, I would have no issue with a salary differential based on how many days one is required to be in the office, with more mandatory days in the office resulting in higher pay.  That seems equitable and fair to me.[/quote]

Why? It doesn’t to me. It’s not like the in-office person inherently works more[/quote]

NP but it costs a lot more to have in-person engagement: clothes, lunches, coffees, wear and tear on car/public transportation costs, and the time itself spent commuting.

Don’t be obtuse.[/quote]

This is where someone screams "Not your employer's problem! Pack a lunch!" Not to mention that WFH employees pay rent and utilities that the employer would otherwise have to pay.

That said, there's nothing stopping an employer from offering a bonus to work in person: maybe they should put their money where their mouths are. Is bonding over the water cooler really that important, if the company has to pay cash for to happen?  Would be interesting to find out. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics