Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "What do you think of the $55 million settlement in the Johns Hopkins malpractice case?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The reason they won the suit was because ... "Plt [Plaintiff's] motion in limine to preclude any refence [sic], testimony or argument that ceritified nurse-midwife Evelyn Muhlhan Deviated from the standard of care and to preclude Loraal Patchen, CNM and Carolyn Gegor CNM from testifying is hereby heard and granted." "Plt motion in limine to preclude any reference, testimony and/or evidence of Maryland Board of Nursings' orer for summary suspension of Nurse-Midwife Evelyn Muhlan is hereby heard and granted." "Plt omnibus motion in limine regarding certain irrelevant and prejudicial evidence is hereby heard and agreed upon as it relates to Group B Streptococcus, is agreed upon as it relates to genetic cause of E.M. injuries and is granted as it relates to deviation from standard of care not casually linked to array of harm (episiotomy)." Therefore the jury never hear what happened *before* she arrived at the hospital.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
