Reply to Reading Man Arrested for Quoting Bible in Public

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Reading Man Arrested for Quoting Bible in Public"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There are rules for counter protests, he was arrested for that.

Charges were dropped so the crazies don’t show up in their town.[/quote]

He wasn’t violating any counter protest rules. He was arrested for disorderly conduct, and the charges were dropped because he wasn’t disorderly.

Do you have a source to back up the claims in your post? 
[/quote]

I assumed that pp was just expressing their opinion.[/quote]

No I was explaining how the law works.

Coos and courts work under different rules. A cop only needs reasonable suspicion… courts need reasonable doubt… society needs neither.[/quote]

Reasonable suspicion is used in determining the legality of a police officer's decision to perform a search.

This man didn’t need to be searched. He was arrested for disorderly conduct and the charges were dropped because he was not conducting himself in a disorderly manner.

You don’t know how the law works and need to quit pushing and broadcasting misinformation on the internet.[/quote]

No it doesn’t have anything to do with searching.

Reasonable suspicion means that any reasonable person would suspect that a crime was in the process of being committed, had been committed or was going to be committed very soon.

This is why vigil antes need not conduct police business they, like you, don’t understand the law.[/quote]

Reasonable suspicion is what law enforcement officers (idk where you are getting the term “reasonable person” from, it’s quite obvious you are making it up) must have to detain a person they suspect of either committing a crime or previously committing a crime.

This man was not detained, genius. He was arrested for committing disorderly conduct. After he was arrested, the charge was dropped because the prosecuting attorney where he lived saw the body can and knew the man wasn’t acting disorderly.

[/quote]

He was 1st detained then arrested.

The cop had reasonable suspicion that he was disorderly interfering. The DA chose not to charge him.

Very normal day for a cop. Cops don’t need beyond a reasonable doubt to arrest.

Cops arrest, DA’s decide to charge of not. Criminal justice 101.

That is how the justice system works.[/quote]

Did you watch the video? He was not detained, he was immediately arrested and put in handcuffs within one minute of arriving.

You are posting legal word salad garbage and should be ignored by reasonable people.

[/quote]

Cops often handcuff people who are nit arrested “for the safety of all”. It prevents coos from misconstruing a move by the perp and shooting them. Perp also don’t know you can’t do things like put your hand in your pocket when detained or you might get shot.

You act like a cop making and arrest and a DA  not charging is unusual.. it’s actually more usual than an arrest being charged.

That’s why coos and courts don’t like each other. Cops catch court let them go, cops catch courts let them go[/quote]

This man wasn’t let go by a court. His charges were dismissed because they wouldn’t hold up in a court case. The prosecutor in charge of bringing cases to court knew that and dropped the charges.

[/quote]

Do you know how many murder cases don’t go to trial because the evidence doesn’t stand up in court, but the person is fully guilty. His charges were dismissed because the DA wants to be elected at some point in his life and he doesn’t want us to come back to him.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics