Reply to He used red pill terminology

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "He used red pill terminology "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP here. He inferred that women over 30 who aren’t married are whores who just want to have a bunch of sex, and that their degrees won’t keep them warm at night. He also made multiple comments about how “women are”. It’s weird that he kept lumping all women together and generalizing. I’ve run across this before and find it creepy. [b]But there were also good things about him[/b].[/quote]

OP, please re-read your own post and look at what I put into bold.

Do not allow yourself to revert to "But...but...but there were good things about him...." in order to justify giving him another chance, or staying in touch, or not blocking him. I worry you're at risk for thinking you should be "nice" or understanding or should "give him the benefit of the doubt." While people are complex, sure, and can have a few jerk tendencies among many good ones, in this case, you're probably looking at good tendencies floating in a stew of much worse ones.  Please don't waste time on this person any longer. Maybe someday his good things will come to the fore and he'll stop parrotting offensive, misogynistic things, but it is NOT on you to make that happen, or save him, or give him the benefit of the doubt. Block him, don't say yes if he begs for "just one more date" or asks to explain himself or whatever. Move on and do not invest more time in this man.

Women still are socialized to be nice, not make waves, and [i]doubt our gut instincts[/i], especially if a man has "good things about him." Please do not be so scared of being single that you cave to all that. Block and move on.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics