Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Fairfax County police to expand use of automated license plate readers this spring"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What would be the concern?[/quote] The same as with speed cameras. People want to speed and not get ticketed. Same here.[/quote] But the article says they have helped find some abducted kids (and stolen cars). That's a good thing, right?[/quote] [b]Think of the children is scraping the bottom of the rhetorical barrel.[/b] [/quote] ? I don't understand what you mean. That was one of the reasons given in the article in support of these license plate readers. Can you explain?[/quote] [b]It's a false choice. If I don't support X, then I hate children. It's one of the weakest rhetorical arguments one can make. When all else fails, just shout "Think of the children." [/b] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children[/quote] nobody said you hate children. One good reason for these is they have helped find abducted children. And they have found stolen cars too. So you don't think that's the real reason the county wants to install them? What's your theory?[/quote] It's the implied choice. If I don't support plate readers, then I don't care about abducted children. Otherwise, I would support plate readers. It doesn't need to be explicitly said. Whether I think FCPD has a valid reason to use plate readers, the system is easily abused. There is almost no regulation on private companies aggregating [b]"public" information [/b]and then making it available to any third party. The government can't collect this information, so they have third parties do it, like Palantir Technologies. [/quote] so what information is it you want to hide - when you're traveling on the public roadways?[/quote] I thought i was pretty clear about it. I am against aggregation by an unregulated third party. FCPD needs to clear about the purpose of the plate readers instead of just "fighting crime" in "high-crime" areas. What are the metrics for success? Why are particular areas being chosen for these plate readers? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics