Reply to Maryland house bill 131 goes into effect without moor’s signature

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Maryland house bill 131 goes into effect without moor’s signature "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So why didn’t they just take the another person part out of 3-322

They legalized bestiality while legalizing oral and anal sex even though [b]repealing the law was unecessary due to Supreme Court precedent[/b] . They legalized bestiality and  moore didn’t want his name on this so he didn’t sign it into law [/quote]

We've heard that before, and we know how it turns out.

[/quote] so why did they do it in a way that legalized bestiality ? [/quote]

They did not do so in a way that legalizes bestiality. The bestiality law had already been replicated in 10-606, making the bestiality portion redundant. In 2019, the MD Dems increased the penalties for bestiality, too. [/quote] 10-606 isn’t a bestiality law , it’s a cruelty to animals law[/quote]

Bestiality is cruelty.[/quote]

It absolutely is NOT.

But whether you like it or not, there ARE animal-attracted-persons out there. And they engage in consensual sex with species other than humans every day. And you do not get to be the morality police here. So get over it.

If you care so much about animals, I hope you’re a vegan and are working every day to ban hunting, fishing, farming and selling/buying and eating meat. Because no one with an animal attraction is killing and eating their lover.  
[/quote]
There is no such thing as consensual sex with an animal. 
You should probably be in jail. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics