Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Maryland house bill 131 goes into effect without moor’s signature "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So why didn’t they just take the another person part out of 3-322 They legalized bestiality while legalizing oral and anal sex even though [b]repealing the law was unecessary due to Supreme Court precedent[/b] . They legalized bestiality and moore didn’t want his name on this so he didn’t sign it into law [/quote] We've heard that before, and we know how it turns out. [/quote] so why did they do it in a way that legalized bestiality ? [/quote] They did not do so in a way that legalizes bestiality. The bestiality law had already been replicated in 10-606, making the bestiality portion redundant. In 2019, the MD Dems increased the penalties for bestiality, too. [/quote] 10-606 isn’t a bestiality law , it’s a cruelty to animals law[/quote] Bestiality is cruelty.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
