Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Sports General Discussion
Reply to "rec league coaching -- OK to give the strongest players slightly more minutes than the weaker?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Our Rec League requires each kid play 50% of the game. If you can play the strong players more, while still giving everyone else 50%, go for it. It's Rec, how are other players going to develop if they aren't given the playing time? And, it's Rec, it's supposed to be fun for everyone - don't be that jerk coach who only cares about winning and not player development, teamwork, fun, etc[/quote] OP. Each child on the team is getting way more than 50%. I've been giving the best players about 90% playing time, and the weaker players around 70%. In practice, the weaker players get most of my attention. [/quote] This is perfectly fine. I've been the weaker player, and have a kid who is the weaker player. It's completely demoralizing when a coach plays a kid for 25% of the game or something like that. But as long as all the kids are playing at least half the game, but 10/11 years old - they also want to win! And they don't want to be the one consistently responsible for not winning. Playing the weaker kids 60-70% and having them experience the job of being on a winning team is way more likely to get them to come back next year than playing everyone exactly evenly and loosing every game.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics