Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Have there really been years that admissions have been easier than in other years? Hasn’t every year"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I started following UrbanBaby (now defunct NYC version of DCUM) 12 years ago and EVERY year the college admissions posts referenced a “bloodbath.” Test optional has obviously changed the process and increased numbers of applicants, but really it hasn’t changed all that much[/quote] Acceptance rates are literally half what they were just 2 years ago, and the number of urm, and first Gen has doubled. Even if you believe in those institutional priorities (which I do), that’s a substantial decline in the number of slots available for white and Asian umc students.[/quote] Those acceptance rates two years ago, were half of what acceptance rates were four years ago. And so on. [/quote] College enrollments peaked in 2010 at 18m undergrads and dropped to 16m undergrads in 2020. What those acceptance rates just mean is that kids are applying to more places. But there are fewer kids applying each year, so things are actually “getting better” over time.[/quote] Exactly. Acceptance rates are a stupid way to consider if college admissions are getting harder. It's easier to apply to more schools now, so there are more applicants per school, so there are more rejections per school. But that doesn't mean there are more qualified applicants or that Larlo's chances have changed that much. If the bottom 1/3 of kids applying to each school never would have applied to them in the past, it really has no bearing on the chances of the top 1/3 of the kids who applied. It's still a crap-shoot, but it's only a crap-shoot among the qualified applicants. [/quote] You still don’t get it. Test optional changed how colleges defined qualified. The last two years really have been completely different than what came before.[/quote] Eh well, if it means the unqualified are getting in, then in two years or so we will see big drops in the graduation rate as the unqualified drop out or flunk out. [/quote] And kids creating petitions to fire professors that are “too hard”….wait that already is happening.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics