Reply to Two Rivers Young V Ludlow for 3rd

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Two Rivers Young V Ludlow for 3rd"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ludlow and it's not even close. Two Rivers is falling apart.[/quote]

Am curious to hear why you say this. We are inbound for Browne (Early Action guaranteed) but will still try to lottery next year for preK3. We've been thinking of listing Two Rivers Young high on our list because of proximity. FWIW we are in a small two-bedroom and hoping to expand our family. We will likely only be in the neighborhood through K at most.[/quote]

Search many recent threads on the issues with TRY. [/quote]

I looked (and went back 4 pages) it seems there are behavioral problems in the MS, non-specific teacher turnover/availability issues, and leadership turnover (which will likely be rectified through hiring). Its not very obvious to me that those issues would mean not bidding on it for the preK3 lotto next year.[/quote]

You seem awfully dismissive of some huge red flags. You don't find it problematic that the executive director and principal both left midyear? That entire grades of teachers quit midyear?[/quote]

Not being dismissive, but searching through the forum isn’t easy either and what I turned up raised questions but wasn’t definitive. Like I said in my earlier post I looked  through 4 pages of search responses and the issues were generic. Like it was not clear that bullying and behavioral problems are throughout all grade levels. The explanation of the principal or ED  leaving was familial issues (I can’t remember which one), which seems reasonable given the reasons provided. Maybe in actuality it was “family issues” :::wink wink:::. But that is not something someone can decipher reading through the threads. I also saw no mention of entire grade of teachers leaving mid year, just passing mentions that they had turnover and were relying on substitutes and consolidated classes to get by.

You seem to have superior knowledge of the threads and have specific ones in mind. You could’ve been helpful and shared some but instead you decided to be condescending and rude to someone at the very early stages of our consideration process. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics