Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Florida school deems Michelangelo's David statute pornographic"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]This is so ridiculous. Do the Christians complaining about this David remember this is the David of David v. Goliath, the Biblical story? And that’s not to mention the historical and artistic significance of the piece. The statue was originally given to two other artists, but neither could actually make it work (huge statue and not the best quality marble). It sat there for decades before Michelangelo came along and carved it into an masterpiece. And originally it wasn’t in an art gallery or some private collection; it was in a public square in Florence and a symbol of the city-state and its struggle against rival powers (supposedly David’s glare was turned towards Rome). This could be a great conversation starter about the linkages between religion, history and art, and absolutely what people expect a classical education to cover. But no… I guess it’a just porn now.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics