Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "San Franciso reparations"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone who is against the reparations is racist. Period.[/quote] Anyone who is for the reparations is stupid. Period. Prior to 1850, California was not under U.S. rule, and Mexican law, which prohibited slavery, was used in the case. September 9, 1850, California became a Union State and subject to the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850. Also, only during the 1849 gold rush did California even have to deal with the issue of slavery, and prior to that the American Indians were closer to slaves in California than Blacks were? "a large number of slave-owning Southerners had travelled to California to seek their fortunes in the 1849 Gold Rush, and many brought their slaves." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery_in_California But, if you really feel that reparations should be paid by future generations, then can children of murder victims be reimbursed by the children of murderers?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
