Reply to UCLA decisions out

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "UCLA decisions out"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In. Loudoun County. [/quote]

I forgot to mention — 3.93 weighted, 1150 SAT. 8 or 9 APs. [b]Basic white girl.[/b]

She won’t go — attending more affordable VT instead.

This was the last one. She did very well — in everywhere she applied except Tennessee where waitlisted.[/quote]

I’m sure she isn’t.  Be better.[/quote]

I think this is the basic white girl who also got into UVA and other prestigious schools despite the uncompetitive stats.   :roll:

[/quote]

It’s clearly a troll trying to show there isn’t actually a bias against white kids[/quote]

I'm pp and there is not a bias against white kids, but that poster is definitely a troll hitting all the threads. [/quote]

DP, but it's pretty astounding that just because *your* kids didn't get in, you assume anyone whose kids *did* get in is trolling - despite their "uncompetitive" stats.  Perhaps this applicant had exactly what the schools were looking for - and perhaps your kid did not.  Stats aren't the end-all be-all.   :roll: [/quote]

Sure you can believe this all you want. I have no dog in this fight. Kid never applied to UCLA and other won’t either. They love football and don’t want to ride a bus an hour way to games. But, c’mon those statistics are not competitive at all for UCLA for anyone. A weighted gpa under 4.0 WITH 8 or 9 APs, which means she would have to be getting Bs in all those classes, and didn’t break a 1200. Trolling, mistype, or leaving off pertinent info, but her own mom describes her as “basic,” which seems accurate. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics