Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Stokes middle school rejected"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Send Bancroft and oyster to MacFarland and there will be a bigger cohort on grade level. [/quote] No, they’ll just do what the Marie Reed, Powell, and Bruce Monroe do. Lottery, private, move. You don’t solve the collective action problem by rezoning when there’s as many alternatives available as there are in DC.[/quote] But we are limted in options if we want to keep spanish. Macfarland is pretty much it. I have tried to lottery for 7 years now (starting in PK3) and never got into a bilingual charter ever. Now for 5th grade most have 2 or less spots available. People need to stop assumng that lottery solves problems. We are looking at a bilingual private in DC, tuition is 42k/year.[/quote] WTH? Mundo is clearing its waitlists, go there.[/quote] So did Stokes I believe. PP isn’t being genuine, to say the least. And not everyone prioritizes continuing immersion past elementary like PP. I think the fact that Bancroft families pretty much exclusively choose Deal over MacFarland/CHEC prove that point. This was a good year for Latin’s second campus and you still have a good shot at Basis. The point is that families have many options, even if not every single one is desirable for every family. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics