Reply to We agreed I would host Easter…now MIL is balking

Forum Index » Family Relationships

Reply to "We agreed I would host Easter…now MIL is balking"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What if the story went like this:

"We have always hosted family holidays, have been doing so for years.  We really enjoy having people in our home and value being the gathering place for extended family.  This year, one part of the family decided that they wanted to host Easter at their house and have everybody travel there instead.  I initially agreed, but now I'm regretting it.  I just don't see what the problem was at my home and I'd really like to keep up that tradition for the kids in the family as long as possible.  So now I'm stuck.  The other family has no obligation to come to our house, obviously.  But are we obligated to all go to them all of a sudden and break the tradition?"

Point is- nobody is "right" here.  If it means a lot to you to host this time, sure you can say that you won't go to MILs and to offer to host everybody.  Absolutely.  But it apparently means a lot to MIL to have people there.  Just decide what matters more.
  [/quote]

If this was posted I would tell the poster that traditions evolve as families grow. [b]If the in-laws insist on hosting, they can't be upset that people don't always want to travel to them and some holidays may now be apart. You can insist on hosting, or insist on being together, but not both[/b]. [/quote]

The same sentiment would apply to OP, right?  OP is now the one "insisting" on hosting.

Again, not saying OP is wrong or right, just that when two people want to host....they just need to work it out by deciding what matters more.  And it seems like the "traveling" isn't so relevant here, as we are talking about driving two hours.[/quote]

1.  MIL/FIL agreed to OP hosting and then backed out.
2.  OP has never been given the opportunity to host for that side of the family.

So yes, OP should insist on hosting, and not worry about the fact that they won’t be together. [/quote]

PP here.  What I think should happen:

Everybody has a conversation where they talk about why they want to host and what matters to them.  Somebody give MIL the opportunity to explain why it matters to her, and OP does the same.  They do so kindly and from a place of remembering that the whole point is to create warm family memories on a holiday, understanding that not everybody's needs/desires will be met.  And they either reach a collective decision, or they don't.  But that is the starting place.

Possible outcomes include:
1. MIL feels heard and she hears and backs down, now more open to the change, and everybody has a nice holiday at OPs.
2. OP realizes that it matters a lot more to MIL than it does to her, and they agree to go to MIL's.  And everybody has a nice holiday.
3. The conversation goes poorly and MIL either doesn't attend Easter at OP's or does so resentfully.

But let's not just skip right to option #3 by everybody getting mad at eachother and digging in that they are somehow right and the other person is wrong.[/quote]

Sounds like that already happened, OP planned to host and MIL agreed to go to OP’s.  No need to go backwards in time to have a conversation that already occurred simply because MIL backed out.  [/quote]

This.  There was a conversation.   MIL agreed.  Now she's changing her mind.  There's no new information here, and no need to keep negotiating this.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics