Reply to death at Dunn Loring metro

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "death at Dunn Loring metro"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Article says you can only have pets (other than service dogs) if they’re in a secured container from which they can not escape. How did he get on with the dog in the first place?[/quote]

What makes you think it wasn't a service dog?[/quote]

This is how people with a legit medical need move in the world with a service animal.

This was a pet. Tragic, but it could have been prevented if the owner was responsible with their pet. And please let's not pretend like this isn't a growing problem.

[img]https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0066/2886/8157/products/61iZ0hDKi4L_70da55ae-619d-4905-938a-46cb58cac423_1024x1024@2x.jpg?v=1525678630[/img][/quote]

Nope.  there is no one way of what it is supposed to look like if you are speaking about a service dog.[/quote]

By law? No, but any person with a legitimate medical need knows that their service animal should be very close to them to perform the medical task that it is required, by law, to do. It's to the benefit of the person with the medical need to have their animal right beside them at all times.

Now there are people who don't really need animals for a viable medical need and will abuse the circumstances for a want, not a need. I know it, you know it. If you don't need your animal to perform a real medical task, you take greater liberties with it being further away from you. Again--I know it, and you know it.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics