Reply to Is anyone’s sleepaway camp requiring the bivalent booster?

Forum Index » Classes, Workshops, Camps, and Playgroups

Reply to "Is anyone’s sleepaway camp requiring the bivalent booster?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP back.  Thank you to those who responded.  For those whose camps are requiring it, have they said why?  Unless everyone gets boosted a month before camp, it is not going to do anything to protect the camp community from transmission (and even a month before the effect is limited).[/quote]

They don't have to.

Don't send your kid.

It's a weed out, use your brain. These are businesses. They need kids to attend. They want to minimize the outbreaks. Parents who care about whether their kid gets and spreads covid will  attend the others will go else where.

Is this a perfect solution of course not and they know that.

If you don't like it go to another camp.[/quote]

While I don't necessarily disagree with you, the camp ultimately gets final say here.

You should let them know where you stand and take your money elsewhere.  If enough customers feel the same we, they may decide to take another look at this requirement.

Not a big deal, plenty of good options out there.

Keep us up to date on how things work out and what you ultimately decide to do.

Good luck!

This.  Even if the booster is less effective by the time the kid goes to camp, requiring boosters means that the kids at the camp will overall be more protected against covid generally.  Also, people who are fully vaccinated are more likely to take reasonable precautions against covid generally and therefore are less likely to send their kids to camp with covid.  Finally, the policy has the effect of weeding out anti-vax covid-deniers who are more likely to bring covid into the camp.

If anyone is inclined to respond that some source now says none of this thinking is correct, include a link to the studies supporting your position or I’m not going to bother responding. [/quote]

OP back again.  I would have written almost this exact same thing 18 months ago.  I was all for Covid vaccine mandates for awhile.  The problem is that the data no longer supports these arguments.  Within a couple months, the vaccine provides virtually no protection from infection or transmission, so it's not protecting communities, except from lots of hospitalizations in vulnerable people.  It does continue to provide great protection from severe disease--but very few kids are at risk of severe disease, and data also suggests that for them, the protection from a vaccine dose or infection--and especially from both--lasts a long time.  Healthy kids don't need boosters every 6 months (maybe not even every year) to protect them from being hospitalized.  And we know now that stretching out vaccine doses means that each dose gives you better protection.

I don't have time right now to dig up links but there are tons out there if you google, both scientific papers and news article citing research to support all of this.

Ridiculing people who aren't giving their kids the bivalent vaccine right now is silly.  It's a huge proportion of the population, over 90%, even in blue states, and many many of those families gave their kids the primary series.  These aren't all "anti-vax covid-denier" people.[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics