Reply to Washington Post: In D.C., a mayoral critic is on the outs. Again.

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Washington Post: In D.C., a mayoral critic is on the outs. Again. "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wow -, this is why we don't get good people in public positions.  Bill is trying to help people being hurt by the mayor. And he is being subject to personal attacks just for doing his job. Noone is perfect and I don't think silly neighborhood squabbles should distract from housing reform.

Will the needy residents of DC be better off without him as an advocate? Guess y'all think so. You must be a bunch of developers. 
[/quote]

It's not "silly neighborhood squabbles". He has actively lobbied against a trail that would make it a million times safer to get around the neighborhood by bike or by walking. Instead, students must risk their lives on one of the busiest streets in NW DC if they want to bike to the new high school. All this because he and his neighbors didn't want to deal with the indignity of people actually using public land behind their houses? WTF?

I'm not a member of the housing board and so can't speak to his behavior there. I guess it is possible that there are people who act completely selfishly on some issues - as he and his fellow NIMBYs have done on the trolley trail - and completely magnanimously on others. But those people are not common and I'm not inclined therefore to give him the benefit of the doubt.[/quote]
It’s incredible that you can reduce everyone to your own metric of YIMBY/NIMBY good/bad. What a sad way to live.[/quote]

Imagine that someone could launch a campaign to selfishly deny their neighbors' kids a safe way to get to school and then, horror of all horrors, be judged on the basis of those actions! What a world we live in![/quote]
Imagine someone who thinks their pet cause of a neighborhood sidewalk is more important than ensuring adequate housing for tens of thousands of highly vulnerable people.

Whatever takes someone to that conclusion should probably take a step back to recalibrate their priorities. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics