Reply to WMATA Gun Ban Lawsuit

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "WMATA Gun Ban Lawsuit"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There are plenty of guns being carried on Metro already. By criminals.

I’m confused as to why allowing people who are [i]known[/i] non-criminals who have gone to the considerable trouble/training of acquiring a permit to legally carry a gun makes you frightened. Because frankly, it doesn’t make any sense. The people most likely to rob/assault/shoot you are already carrying their guns on the train/bus with you right now. Like RIGHT NOW.

The people LEAST likely to rob/assault/shoot you are the ones you feel you should fear the most?

Apply some critical thinking here. [/quote]

Training? Joe Sixpack Chucklef**k can go buy a gun on credit. And according to MAGA federal judge in NY he has a right to carry that weapon into a daycare or virtually anywhere else other than a courthouse (of course) or givernment building thanks to the radical historical revisionism of Scalia and Thomas. So much for critical thinking, huh?[/quote]

You genuinely haven’t got the slightest idea what you’re talking about.

What difference does it make if people buy their firearms on credit?  Are lower income people not entitled to self defense?  The judge in NY properly saw through the State’s attempt to end run a binding Supreme Court ruling. The whole “sensitive places” argument is a dodge. Businesses can already eject anyone for any reason or no reason at all. And I hate to break it to you, but tons of guns have long gone in and out of NY day cares every day, on the hips of their law enforcement clientele and the powerful, privileged, politically connected few who were the only ones who, until recently, could get carry permits in New York.  Before Bruen, half the States were shall issue and there was no glut of toddlers maiming each other with firearms at day care.

As for “radical historical revisionism,” that’s precisely what Bruen got rid of.  Even the briefest research will establish that Bruen is wholly in accord with the intent of the Framers.

Your juvenile name calling and uninformed and/or dishonest exaggerations really expose your irrational, unreasoned, emotionally reactive non-logic. [/quote]

+1. But you are wasting your breath. There is a vocal, but quite irrational, group of DCUM posters that aren't just pro-gun control; they absolutely HATE gun owners.[/quote]

Hate is an understatement. There are multiple posters here who say things like “I hope the gun owners resist when we send federal agents to seize their guns so that they are shot and killed”. Absolutely miserable bunch of people. Warms my heart watching them take L after L in the courts. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics