Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "City council voted today to allow bicyclists to ignore stop signs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cars NEVER stop for stop signs unless there is conflicting traffic. Seriously - stand by any stop sign and see for yourself. Every single one rolls through. Allowing cyclists to roll through increases safety because they can proceed through the intersection when they see it's clear. [/quote] They never stop even if there is conflicting traffic. That is why the stop light cameras (like the one in Glover Park) rake in millions in fines. Because none of the drivers in this city actually knows what "stop" means. The reality is that - outside of the intersections with these cameras - the Idaho Stop is perfectly normal and accepted behavior even for heavy vehicles. The total hypocrisy of drivers on this - and other issues of compliance with traffic laws - is phenomenal.[/quote] Err, bicyclists are the ones claiming here that they should be exempt from a law (stopping at stop signs) that everyone else must follow. Sure, you may have seen a driver run a stop sign but there's a half million vehicles in the city so you're going to see all kinds of things. And drivers are not asking the city council to give them a special exemption from the law. [/quote] A cyclist yielding at an open intersection does not harm anyone. Cars not stopping can be fatal.[/quote] That's not how any of this is going to work. No one is going to remember or even be aware of any details about "open intersections" or any other caveats that may be in the bill. People will just interpret this as: Bicyclists don't have to obey stop signs or traffic lights. Maybe some drivers will interpret this as stop signs being optional too? People will have all kinds of crazy interpretations of this. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics