Reply to Hogan orders suspension of “good and substantial reason” for gun permits

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Hogan orders suspension of “good and substantial reason” for gun permits"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Democrats have been given the chance of a lifetime to engage centrists who want reasonable, not murderous, abortion laws, and who want reasonable, not murderous, gun laws.

PLEASE USE IT. We need to keep the house and senate!!!

[/quote]

The governor of the state has asked the state to comply with the SCOTUS ruling.

What would you have him do??[/quote]

Take a stand and sue as a state.

Or comply and in a press conference, excoriate the ruling and say he's opposed to it and only doing it under duress.[/quote]

+1000

He really was not compelled to do this. It's all posturing for his preferred replacement. That's ok...she's not getting in. [/quote]

Let me explain this for you as simply as possible. The highest tribunal in the country decided that the Second Amendhebt means what it said. Bearing arms outside the home is a Constitutionally protected civil right. Denial of that right would be among other things cause for an action under the Civil Rights Act, with all the problems that poses for contumaceous officials. Hogan took an Ostia to uphold the law. Like it or not, the law is determined, and he had no choice but to do what he did. [/quote]

Let me explain this to you, dear, instead. SCOTUS decision came from a packed court from the previous administration's legislative Republucan lock and the denial of Garland in the one before that- all from the same people. So there's a big issue right there. And it should be dealt with in the federal legislature.  There  are no term limits, no ethics guidelines, no reason  to have only 9 members on that court. All this has to change.

Secondly- dear, the SCOTUS doesn't legislate. It was about the reversal of a precedent. Look up the word. Not the same as law.

Md wasn't EVER obligated to also join. No state is obligated. This was NY, not Md. Let's let the cumbersome paperwork  that people may want to file do the job of  a looong delay until it fails. Let a better governor handle this.

Third,  your idea of 2nd amendment rights has NOTHING  to do with walking around with guns. Nothing. Or automatic weapons,  or most of the issues arising EACH WEEK  because of guns. This lives erroneously in your pin sized brain.  You don't understand the 2nd amendment at all,  and probably have not ever read the Constitution.  It is clear here that  you are clueless.

The NRA seems to be in charge here, not our govt. This has nothing to do with the Constitution.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics