Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS Protection Request"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is zero proof Ginni has done anything wrong. None. Also, are you okay with people who disagree with the 3 who dissented getting daily protests, their churches visited and their Children’s schools published. [/quote] Of course not. You see.... the standard is simple. If they are liberal Justices, or Justices who vote in a way which liberals approve, they are most deserving of protection. If they aren't liberal or don't vote the right way, they absolutely should be protested and threatened. [/quote] They already receive security and the Democratic congress overwhelmingly voted in June to extend that security to their immediate family members. They want the protests to stop, because they are a nuisance on their enjoyment of their property. Too bad, they already voted that kind of protest falls under first amendment. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
