Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Value of highly ranked undergrad if law school in your future"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not quite the same question you're asking, but another consideration is the undergrad education they will get as an end in itself, not just a means to law school. Because, realistically, the plans made by a 17-18 year old who has not yet been out in the world much yet are almost certainly going to change over four years of college. I am also for minimizing debt, since we know that could impact their adult life for decades in negative ways. But I wouldn't choose an undergrad with the expectation that law school is of course going to be the next step. choose the undergrad for the undergrad that will be the best fit for them to learn and grow.[/quote] One of the PPs. I agree with this. Law school should not be a factor in choosing a prestigious school. However, one might decide to choose a prestigious school for other reasons, weighing all factors including cost.[/quote] I also agree with this, but I think doubt the difference in education quality between Wooster and Bates is enough to justify a $200k price tag differential. This seems like a no brainer to me.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics