Reply to Do you go commando in your active wear ?

Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion

Reply to "Do you go commando in your active wear ?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Work out attire is designed to be worn sans underwear. It’s about freedom of movement and flexibility without binding or bunching.

Honestly you folks are a gaggle of prudes. [/quote]

Or some people simply prefer to wear underwear under their workout clothes. I'm not sure what your preferences have to do with my preferences. I'm not judging you for going commando -- I just personally don't want to.

Not all workout clothing has a liner -- many leggings and short don't, actually. Since I prefer to wear my own underwear with workout clothes, I look for workout clothes that are not lined. I like the quality and feel of my own underwear to most workout liners.

I don't wear underwear that binds or bunches. Not ever, but especially not when I workout. I buy underwear specifically for its' comfort and ability to stay put.

I often wear period underwear in lieu of a pantyliner on heavy period days. This also facilitates being able to workout on those days. Again, this is much preferable to a lined workout bottom for obvious reasons.

It's also weird that you are saying people who prefer to wear underwear under their workout clothes "prudes" when there are multiple people on the first page of this thread arguing that the main reason not to do it is to avoid visible panty lines, as though the slight shadow of an underwear line in someone's workout attire is a pearl-clutching event.

People should wear what is most comfortable for workouts, and there really are not any rules beyond sanitation and commonly agreed-upon decency standards. You do you.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics