Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "VA House of Delegates reaches new low - HB 1 "personhood amendment" to be voted on tomorrow"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]This bill apparently passed the VA House. It has had first, second, and third readings. I don't know how many readings are required in Virginia, but I can't imagine it's more than three. So, the bill probably goes to the Senate now. A good source for the legislative status is here: http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?121+sum+HB1 The bill was amended to make clear that birth control is still permitted. But, it is still a very draconian bill. [/quote] I'm confused - I thought the amendment was defeated? [/quote] Click on the link. There was a substitute bill that was defeated, but the amendment passed: 02/13/12 House: Motion to pass by Amendment by Delegate Watts agreed to (64-Y 34-N) On the page listing amendments (of which there is only one listed), it says this: (HB1) AMENDMENT(S) PROPOSED BY THE HOUSE DEL. WATTS [[b]Passed by[/b]] 1. After line 26, introduced insert ยง 8. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as affecting lawful contraception. Emphasis added by me. [/quote] Thanks Jeff. I looked at that before I posted and saw the amendment - but for the life of me I can't find a mention anywhere in the press about the amendment passing. Contrarily, all I can find are references such as this one - saying a contraception amendment was not considered: "Del. Vivian Watts, D-Fairfax, proposed an amendment declaring that nothing in the bill would be construed to affect legal contraception. She said many forms of birth control work by preventing the implantation of a fertilized egg, so those types of contraception could run afoul of Marshall's bill. The House voted 64-34 to not consider Watts' amendment." That's why I'm confused. I just want to be sure I understand. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics